« You've Got to Keep Him Separated | Main | Thanks to the Stomach Flu, We're Celebrating St. Patty's Day Early »

February 07, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c83069e200e5501508fb8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How Not to Tame a Preschooler:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Schwartzenegger insists the victims of the 2007 Southern California firestorm temporarily residing at Jack Murphy Stadium are happy.
First he calls Tonight Show host Jay Leno an "idiot". Then he drops this bomb.
If it were Gray Davis the gods would have their media attack him mercilessly for these mistakes. Together they may be enough to cost any other politician his career. But not Arnold Schwartzenegger.
They say he makes comments like these all the time, clues which are all buried. And it's because they have BIG plans for him::::He is a tool who will be used to accomplish historical evil for the gods.

They say there is a strange sense of "unease" at the State Capitol, perhaps because he doesn't belong there. He is not American. Sadly this is an issue that is too readily discounted:::::His loyalties lie with a country that was the enemy of the United States a mere 65 years ago. Just as we witnessed with Clinton in 1992 expect blacks to register and vote en masse for Schwartzenegger as well, a clue and a red flag.

Just as we haven't seen any more of that "Everybody is happy." idiocy from the Preditor so do we no longer hear anything of the possibility a firefighter started one if not more of these SoCal fires, buried forever.
Weight training (promoted in every prison system in the country), promotion of pharmeceuticals (steroids), desensitizing "guy flicks" all prove the name "Preditor" is warranted.
Less than 24 hours passed after a traffic accident on I-5 before Schwartzenegger declared a state of emergency, but it took over 2 full days before he did the same for the San Francisco Bay envionmental disaster incident.


The gods love reverse positioning, and this Austrian genocide issue is an OUTSTANDING example:::
There is symbolism between the two:::Hitler was an Austian-born leader of a foreign nation.
It appears as if Hitler is a monster. When Schwartzenegger does his thing he will appear as a hero, an enforcer of decency. Quite the opposite is true, ironically.
Monsters like Al Capone, violent gangsters from the 20s and 30s thought they were going up. Instead they were routed into the Nazi death camps::::This Austrian genocide event disposed of these monsters.
Schwartzenegger's genocide event will dispose of society's VICTIMS, people who are the way they are (abusive, abrasive, violent, criminal) BECAUSE of their disfavor.
People will say the Italians were pushed into it too, but I'd like to remind you black evidence is contradictory (crack, AIDS, etc). Italian evidence REINFORCES corruption (1906, ). Based on these clues it is safe to say the Italians are more disfavored than Africans.
Ironically, Hiter is the enforcer of decency. Schwartzenegger is the monster. But the movies already prove Schwartzenegger is a promoter of indencency, so when his genocide event happens there will be no secrets.

This exposure from me can change their script. Or, more appropriately said, alter the Manifest Destiny's senarios to fall in line with the god's script.
That means Schwartzenegger was never going to be used. But I think the evidence we have suggests he in fact IS the one foreshadowed with the Hitler figure, his genocide event foreshadowed with the Holocaust.
And, ironically, blacks will show up at the polls to vote for their own deaths.
I believe there is symbolism with Ronald Reagan as well.

There is one geographic clue I have not addressed in years:::Uranus, a planet tilted 90 degrees on its axis. I have stated in years past that I think this is a clue offered by the gods suggesting the fate of planet Earth, that tectonic plate subduction would be the method of disposal:::Earth’s axis will shift breaking continental plates free and initiating mass subduction.
Undesirables will either perish in the government marijuana erradication program "gone awry" or be the recipients of reparations granted by the US government because of it.
I believe the New Testiment battle of the Anti-Christ and the Second Coming of Christ will ocurr in subsequent years SPECIFICALLY because these people will be distracted with the money during the event.
When the Earth's axis shifts people will be cast into outer space with gold cards in hand.
I think this was foreshadowed on an episode of the Simpsons where Homer and Bart are on the disfavored ship and eject, only to experience a sense of euphoria, expand then explode in the vacuum of space.
When the United States government pays out reparations I believe you have less than a handful of years before the gods end on Planet Earth.

Vienna was the center of the music world for a reason.
Any middle age person today remembers the excitement surrounding classical music in the mid-20th century.
Classical music was "in play". Expect the same "magic" was employed back then as well.
Motzart's ugly for a reason. Similarly, Schwartzenegger's appearance is suspect as well.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reparations for a government marijuana erradication program gone awry a.wav
Reparations for a government marijuana erradication program gone awry b.wav

Their intent with Horrible::::They'll being me back in the Preditor clone host for the MarijuanaErradicationProgram "gone awry", ironically putting the disfavored's 20th century enemies in black and Latino clone hosts for this extermination event.

Hi All,
I'm new here, just getting into this blogging thing. I chose this post since I too have a clever little limit tester. She is 20 months and seems to have turned into a little terror over night. I don't know if its a good thing or bad thing that she isn't talking a lot yet. Looking forward to getting in the mix.

There is a huge payoff in this, but you have to wait awhile to get it. It is when your 2 yr old grandson is being "terrible" with his mom/your daughter. But of course he is an angel for you ;)

My 9-year-old recently said to me,

"No. I'm not doing it. And don't try any of the parent tricks that you read about on the Internet or in one of those books. I can tell when you're doing that."

I hear that some 15-year-olds don't want to get out of the tub, either. And those suckers are almost impossible to lift up and move on your own.

I think that kids actually get harder to reason with as they get older. Until they're like 35 and have their own kids...or something.

I give my kids 2 or 3 choices, they go get something else. My husband is worse, he tells them and then yells at them when they do not like what was given.

"...they must eat brownies and ice cream with a side of video games for dinner in order to make it another day on the planet."

Just perfectly put. Although in our world it's cereal and milkshakes with a side of Max & Ruby.

Yes, it's a dad thing. Don't ask questions when you mean to lay down how it is. But I do think choices are good. When they're, like, carrots or broccoli? chicken or eggs? Not: bath or dessert? Total sympathy here...

My MIL is the worst:

Do you want yogurt?
Do you want juice?
Do you want cookies?
Do you want crackers?
Do you want lunch?
Do you want peaches?

By this time, I've made a grilled cheese and cut up an apple and it's sitting in front of them.

My toddler was an angel until about two months ago when gremlins came in and replaced him with a look alike, but evil, model. I used to be able to get him to do anything simply by offering two choices. Now, I find myself slipping into bad parenting techniques, like asking everything as a question. Like I'm somehow asking my toddler his permission to get ready for bed, or some other task he doesn't want to do. WTF am I thinking? Sigh. Someone give me a slap upside the head!

"Apples or oranges" sound like good toddler options to me. At least they're both fruit. Over here it's more like "Frozen waffles or half a slimfast bar?"

All I do is give choices. "Do you want to play together nicely or do you want to play by yourself?" Do you want to watch tv quietly or do you want to lose tv?" (Because with 4 boys, if one is screaming in the living room and the others can't hear the tv there is a potential fist fight.) "Do you want to behave or do you want to go to bed?"

I actually have the older 3 trained to the point where I don't have to ask the question, I can just ask them what their choices are.

Now, the husband is a different story. We're down to "If you want me to wash the dishes then you need to empty the dishwasher so that there is some place to put them. Otherwise you are SOL and you can wash your own damn dishes."

Oh, this is too funny! And I thought the baby (and negotiating different parenting styles at this stage) was hard!

I have to admit I end with "okay?", not as a means of obtaining agreement, but as a means of verifying that what I've said has been heard and understood (and will hopefully be acted upon before I have to repeat myself.

"No fank you." That is so cute.

My hubby is alot like Luann's -- on the couch while the child runs around crazy. Only mine might just be gassier.

I am one of "those" mothers.
When my kids are acting like screaming banshees in the grocery store, I leave. In the car. Back home. To your room!
Hubby is the one who buys them stupid, plastic, probably made in China lead paint covered toys to make them be quiet. I have more worthless crap in the back seat of my car. I try to tell him that you can't reason with a 4 and a half year old, even harder with the 18 month old.
K.I.S.S.


I'm like you are. An occasional choice like chocolate or regular milk, but only when I'm willing. I think it's awesome that he tries. One day he'll hopefully remember that he's the boss.

Aw, thanks Cait!

The crazy person would be the dude who said he got to my blog my googling "My mom's tits."

You = not crazy at all :)

Hi Kristen,
I just discovered your blog about a week ago, and I've been loving it. I've been reading back through the archives and laughing/ empathizing the whole way through. Just saying hi, letting you know that that crazy person reading your archives isn't a psycho stalker or something. ;)

I really admire your wit and humor. I hope that when I have children, I will be as strightforward and spirited about the challenges of motherhood as you are!

-Cait

My son. Not my husband. My husband is laying on the couch right where he was when I left.

Thank your lucky stars your husband tries to discipline at all. Every single time I leave my son alone with my husband for more than an hour I come home and his face is covered in chocolate and he's bouncing off the walls.

We do the whole 2 choices thing, and then K. comes up with a radical THIRD option and thus the argument ensues.

Too smart for her own good, that one.

Heh, I have to catch myself all the time from asking a question when I really don't want to give Cordy a choice. I think I'm properly trained now to never ask her a question unless I really am giving her a choice.

And more than two or three choices for a preschooler just leads to a meltdown, I've found. Their little brains can't handle that much choice. The problem comes when I ask, "Do you want juice or milk?" and she'll tell me one, and then the other. I have yet to get her to understand that I was offering a choice, not offering to give her both.

I have the same bad habit of asking my kids if they are ready to do whatever needs to be done. "Are you ready to go to bed?" "Are you ready to eat your broccoli?""Are you ready to wipe your own butt?" Given that our oldest girl is a litigator (like yours seems to be) we end up in a round and round discussion with me saying, "Your job is to obey me right now." I sound like a nun-teacher from back in the day when they pulled ears and slapped with rulers.

That said, my huz makes errors I cringe over as well. I think it's the fact that he doesn't engage them day in and day out, so he doesn't get tired of the "You said I could have chocolate milk if I cleaned my plate, not if I ATE everything on it!" argument like I do. Seriously, he needs to stop using the term, "clean your plate."

If you offer more than 2 choices your just asking for it.

I say that like I'm an expert or something. I am having hell with my daughter right now. She turns 4 Sunday and she thinks she knows it all. I am definitely not a pushover parent but we are having a power struggle right now.

God I hope I win.

I agree with you that 2 choices is plenty for a preschooler.

Sometimes, when the hubs is actually at home and awake for lunch, he will ask our 4 yr old what she wants and give her no choice at all. Usually she wants chips, cookies, cheese, and a cupcake. The sad part is that if I wasn't here to intervene, he'd probably give it to her.

Snort. I was just thinking this morning - as I placed the proper straw in my son's apple juice with 2 icecubes - why the hell did we raise our kids to think that mommy was a cocktail waitress?

I have to tell my husband not to ask when he really means to tell, too! Drives me up the freakin' wall. He has gotten a little bit better about it, but, dang.

My husband and my son have these weird self-perpetuating testosterone-fueled battles for household dominance, too, which only makes it worse. Look out for when your SON is three.

When we're at, say, the grocery store, and my son is pushing one of those little kid carts, I can say, "Please be careful to push slowly and watch out for other people," and he'll listen to me. I may have to say it again five or ten minutes later, mind, but he'll listen.

However my husband will say, the moment we walk into the store, "Watch where you're going! Slow down!" in the Authoritative Dad voice. And then my son will say, "I AM being careful!" and immediately start pushing faster and more recklessly. And then my husband will say, "You're not LISTENING to me. You make me SO ANGRY WHEN YOU DON'T LISTEN TO ME I'M YOUR FATHER YOU LISTEN TO YOUR FATHER RIGHT NOW OR WE'RE GOING HOME." And then my son will tip the cart over.

And I'm always like, "WTF are you X-chromosome-deficient freaks arguing over? And why does the kid always behave like an angel when I go in to store with him alone?"

Fun times . . .

Yes! two choices are plenty. I find that the tantrum can be avoided when interrupting a happy activity with the warning: 5 minutes. That gives the child time to adjust to the change in activities, and an opportunity to enjoy five more minutes. It's magical I tell you.

Perhaps this is some type of father requirement. My husband does the same thing and it drives me bonkers. The worst is when we have something to do on a Saturday and I tell my son to get his shoes on and he whines that he doesn't want to go. Then husband waffles and says, "Well, maybe we should just stay home if he doesn't want to go." No! He's three. He doesn't have a choice. My husband just wants to avoid the 5 minutes of crying/arguing when he tells our son he has to go.
No backbone!

It truly must be a man thing. I have been telling my husband to TELL not ASK for almost 9 years now, and he still puts a question mark at the end of sentences with our kids.

Too many choices are bad for preschoolers. Mine can hardly choose between two things and once they've chosen they usually change their minds.

Yeah, the OKAY? (voice inflection going up) is a bad one too.

I used to do that until my therapy college professor counted how many times I said that and "alright?" during a session --I think it was like 35.

Not any more. Okay as a statment = good. Question = very bad, especially with smartass kids.

My husband does the same thing. My own personaly favorite is when he asks them what they want for dinner. Ummm...candy and pop?

LOL! The other one I like is ending everything with "ok?", when what I mean is, "do it now!".

The comments to this entry are closed.